The Obamas Pledge

November 30, 2009
By Snarky Basterd

backwards_pledgeVia Mitchieville

Stormbringer speculates whether this image is PhotoChopped or some new leftist salute or just evidence of Zero’s incredible stupidity. I’m rolling with either evidential stupidity or some new leftist salute (the lapel pin and wedding rings tell me the image is real, although Mobama’s hips DO look thinner than usual):

“I pledge undying love to the fags of the United Nations of Globalism and to kill all Republicans wherever they stand, one dominion, over everyone, taking liberty and justice from all.”

VN:F [1.8.1_1037]
Rating: 5.0/5 (7 votes cast)
The Obamas Pledge5.057
  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Obamas Fly in Chef 860 Miles… Just to Make Pizza What a nice friggin’ use of taxpayer money there b....
  2. I Pledge…to Give Obugger the Middle Finger Like this video does… ...
  3. Weekend at Barry’s, Patrick Hughes, and teh Snark BTW: Here’s the next miracle we need to work on,...
  4. Obama Loses Head, Names KSM Terrorism Czar WASHINGTON — pResident Barack Obama made a decision in record...
  5. The Attacker-in-Chief and His STFU Speech P.S. My apologies. It took all morning to get this...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Tags: , , , ,

33 Responses to “ The Obamas Pledge ”

  1. Woodsterman on November 30, 2009 at 7:19 am

    I wouldn’t put it past them, but I’m sure it was PhotoChopped.

    UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
  2. foutsc on November 30, 2009 at 7:43 am

    I think it was photoshopped, too. But like Bush’s records in Rathergate, even though the photo is fake, it’s still true!

    UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  3. labcat on November 30, 2009 at 8:04 am

    it’s the black dress. it just makes you think she looks slimmer.
    she looks like she wants to rip your head off. so first ladylike. pfff

    UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  4. Karen Howes on November 30, 2009 at 8:14 am

    Yes, Mobama’s hips DO look too thin not to have been Photoshopped.

    I wouldn’t be a bit surprised if “progressives” did take a pledge like that, either.

    UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  5. Priss on November 30, 2009 at 8:59 am

    If it was shopped, kudos to the person’s attention to detail. Wedding bands, M’s hair, and Zero’s lapel pin. That said, I would need more context of the event at hand to be sure.

    UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  6. KingShamus on November 30, 2009 at 2:07 pm

    Yeah, I’m pretty sure it’s a p-chop.

    Having said that, I must say Michelle My Belle is looking particularly Klingon in this pic.

    UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  7. Angel on November 30, 2009 at 6:41 pm

    good grief..look @ them…I need an Advil now!!:)

    UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  8. Ron Russell on November 30, 2009 at 6:57 pm

    The old, old saying never has rang more true, “believe nothing you hear and only half of what you see”. I only know one thing for sure, Rev. Wright would be proud!

    UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  9. Grace Nearing on November 30, 2009 at 7:14 pm

    Looks like a PhotoShopped mirror reverse image. Not that hard to do really.

    I wouldn’t be a bit surprised if “progressives” did take a pledge like that, either.

    Nah. Progressives don’t bother to salute at all. Also, no progressive thinks Obama is a progressive. Some moderate Dems think Obama is a progressive. Tea Party Conservatives think Obama is a raging progressive, especially for a Kenyan. Beltway Conservatives couldn’t care less if Obama is a progressive or a Kenyan; they only care that their contracting, lobbying, and punditing jobs are all lined up.

    UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
    Rating: -3 (from 3 votes)
    • admin SB on November 30, 2009 at 8:38 pm

      I see. So … do you think the pResident and his … ahem … cow always wear their wedding rings on the wrong hand or that Zero wears a lapel pin on the wrong side or that Mobama’s typical part has suddenly been imparted on the wrong side? Are your eyes really that bad?

      UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
      Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)
      • Grace Nearing on December 1, 2009 at 12:12 am

        Snarky: Thanks for stopping by my place. I left a response to your questions/comments* — and I’ve dutifully included my website’s URL here.

        Well, my eyes may just be that bad. But hey, Hollywood made Gary Cooper (a natural rightie) bat lefty when he played Lou Gehrig in Pride of the Yankees simply by flipping the negative over and dicing and splicing. (A cheap trick they didn’t bother to do with Ray Liotta playing Joe Jackson in Field of Dreams. Shoeless Joe batting righty! An abomination). That being said, this is a striking photoshop of the Obamas, who, I think, poseurs or not, have mastered the correct pledge protocol.

        *Snarky, I have never deleted a commenter’s comment. I lost a whole archive’s worth of comments a while ago when I changed layouts and switched from using Haloscan to using Blogger’s plain-old comments system. It is possible that the old comments are floating around in some Google cache, but I’ve never checked.

        UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
        Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Cao on November 30, 2009 at 8:51 pm

      Let’s call the “progressives” for what they really are: marxists or communists. “Beltway Conservatives” contracting lobbying and punditing jobs?

      Most conservative pundits I know have REAL J.O.B.S. unless they found themselves unemployed, they do it for fun like Dr. Dave here. As opposed to admitted PAID HACKS like Markos, the leader of the Daily Kossacks. Pundits I know don’t make a dime off of “punditing”. I thought all those “contracting”, “Lobbying” and “punditing” jobs were all zipped up by the Obamatrons. Hell everybody knows that even the Chrysler dealerships that donated money to Bush were thrown overboard when Obama did his FASCIST TAKEOVER of the automobile industry.

      Do tell; interesting the vast span of space between them thar ears, LOL

      UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
      Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)
    • Zardoz on November 30, 2009 at 9:13 pm

      I’m a bit confused on this, Grace. If Obama isn’t considered a progressive, why did the Democratic Party nominate him in the first place and why did Democrats vote for him in the election. During the election, all Obama talked about was “change”, but he never stated what that “change” would be and no one bothered to ask him. Sounds to me like the Democratic Party bought a pig in a poke and then sold it to the American voters, not very ethical!

      Speaking of pigs, I would also like to suggest that the Republicans are certainly not the only ones engaged in pork barrel politics within the Beltway. “Rolling Stone” magazine in a May 2008 article highlighted the “Queen of Pork”, Hillary Clinton (www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/20306341/the_queen_of_pork).

      It seems to me that the Democrats are at least as adept at spending other people’s money for their own benefit as are the Republicans, likely more so! And the Democrats have their own lobbyists and pundits with their snouts in the trough. Pot calling the kettle black, Grace?

      UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
      Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
      • Grace Nearing on December 1, 2009 at 12:29 am

        Trust me or not, Zardoz, full-tilt progressives are not happy with Obama and they’re not happy with Congress. (Then again, American progressives are never happy.) They want a single-payer healthcare system (not gonna get it). They don’t want any more troops sent to AfPak; a progressive-in-good standing sees 30,000 soldiers heading for AfPak as another $30 billion that’s not going into domestic programs. They want the Iraq and the AfPak wars ended yesterday (not gonna happen). About the one thing Obama and a Democratic Congress can deliver on is the re-regulation of stuff that’s been de-regulated since the mid-1990s (especially the FIRE sector of the economy). That might make a progressive half-smile.

        UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
        Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
        • Ogre on December 1, 2009 at 8:24 am

          So are progressives like the old Christmas saying, “Every time a freedom is taken away, a progressive smiles?”

          UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
          Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
          • admin SB on December 1, 2009 at 8:25 am

            An excellent observation…

            UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
            Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
        • Zardoz on December 1, 2009 at 12:15 pm

          Grace, if the Democrats control the White House and both Houses of Congress and they still can’t get what they want, then it sounds to me like the Democratic party is a spent, corrupt force. Or maybe what the Democrats want is just not what the American people want and they have run up against a wall of popular discontent and opposition to their initiatives.

          Also, could you please explain what exactly you mean by “full-tilt progressives”? Where exactly do these people fit in on the political spectrum?

          UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
          Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
          • Grace Nearing on December 1, 2009 at 4:12 pm

            In America, a full-tilt progressive is someone who really wants to live in a Scandinavian country but doesn’t like the climate.

            UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
            Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
            • admin SB on December 1, 2009 at 4:14 pm

              Well they won’t like it here either when the next ice age sets in.

              UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
              Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)
            • Zardoz on December 1, 2009 at 8:09 pm

              Perhaps they could all move to Malmö, Sweden, it’s 25% Muslim. The full-tilt progressives could debate global warming with the suicide bombers. Scandinavia is suffering the ravages of Politically Correct thought, I’d hate to see the U.S. go the same route!

              UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
              Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Ogre on November 30, 2009 at 9:45 pm

      So socialists/progressives think obama’s not progressive/socialist enough? That sure says a lot about the progress that progressives want.

      UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  10. Teresa Rice on November 30, 2009 at 8:25 pm

    Even if it is photo-shopped, it still shows the reality of the Obama’s not having a clue of how to salute. Michelle looks like she’s pressing on to herself trying to give herself a little sexual tittilation since BO can’t give her any.

    UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
    Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)
  11. Amusing Bunni on November 30, 2009 at 8:45 pm

    Looks photoshopped to me too! But either way, these two scums are such an embarrassment to America. Their hatred of our Great Country is written all over their ugly mugs!
    I can’t stand to look at either of them anymore. They are nauseating, now I must go puke.

    UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
    Rating: +3 (from 3 votes)
  12. Matt on November 30, 2009 at 9:19 pm

    Shopped it is. They do look rather uncomfortable with the process though.

    UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  13. Eman on November 30, 2009 at 10:48 pm

    Are these to southpaws or what? Left hand over the heart? For their sake I hope it is photoshopped. If it’s not, it would explain a lot about these two. A whole lot.

    UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  14. Opus #6 on November 30, 2009 at 11:44 pm

    It MUST be photoshopped. I mean, what other reason could there be for the Obamas to put EITHER hand over their breast? I know he prefers the double-crotch salute. And you don’t even have to photoshop those!

    UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
  15. Karen Howes on December 1, 2009 at 12:26 am

    I would consider that the image could have been reversed (I really hate to think that both of them would be dumb enough to not know that you place your RIGHT hand over your heart), but those look like wedding rings on their fingers. Usually people in the west wear those on their left hands.

    UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
    • Grace Nearing on December 1, 2009 at 4:18 am

      Easy enough to do. Reverse the image; photoshop on the rings (not much detail to the rings; very generic looking); and then copy and paste the flag pin on to the lapel. Voila!

      UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  16. MK on December 1, 2009 at 5:54 pm

    It has to be photo-shopped, surely they’re not that stupid.

    UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  17. Eman on December 1, 2009 at 7:15 pm

    He looks like he’s just had a huge Crapcake for lunch and Mobama had the liars lunch special:Crazy Fruitloops from the leftwood land of silliness~~~~~

    UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
    Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)
  18. 11Delta on January 13, 2010 at 2:59 pm

    The ribbons on the Marine in the background are on the wrong side.
    The PhotoChopper almost caught ‘em all. Still the same though.

    UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • admin SB on January 13, 2010 at 3:10 pm

      THAT was an excellent catch.

      UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  19. admin SB on December 1, 2009 at 4:24 pm

    Should I be assigning you an account as a contributor at this point, or are you just bored with posting at your own site?

    Just an FYI, this is a place for creativity … and for ridiculing Zombiecrats. (Read the “About” page.)

    It’d probably just be best for you to move back to your own world, so you can read more Maureen Dowd.

    UN:F [1.8.1_1037]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Leave a Reply

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

Needs More Boob Belt

Michelle Obama needs more boob belt Right click to embiggen, then spread the meme.

Follow Us on NetworkedBlogs

Blogroll

Conservative Blogs Central